Mortgage Morning, Realty Lee – Profits Dawn with Me

Realtor, Mortgage Broker, Business Consultant

As a licensed Realtor and Mortgage Broker, with 30+ years experiences in business, real estate, and mortgage, definitely I can help you achieve your goal regarding Realty Mortgage and business.

Morning Lee – Investor / Profit Coach

Realty Mortgage and Business
Morning Lee - Licensed Realtor, Mortgage Broker

Contact Us here if you need any help for Mortgage, Realty & Business

  • Canadian Homebuyers Return in July, Posting the Fourth Consecutive Sales Gain

    Canadian Homebuyers Return in July, Posting the Fourth Consecutive Sales Gain

    Canadian Homebuyers Return in July, Posting the Fourth Consecutive Sales Gain

    Today’s release of the July housing data by the Canadian Real Estate Association (CREA) showed good news on the housing front. Following a disappointing spring selling season, National home sales were up 3.8% in July from the month before, with Toronto seeing transactions rebound 35.5% since March. However, the total number of Toronto sales remains low by historical standards.

    On a year-over-year basis, total transactions have risen 11.2% since March. 

    There is growing confidence that the Canadian economy will resiliently weather the tariff trauma. The Canadian dollar is up, and longer-term interest rates have edged downward in the past ten days. Traders are now anticipating a rate cut by the Federal Reserve in September.

    Tuesday’s release of the Canadian CPI will provide another data point for the Bank of Canada. Economic growth has held up, in large part because much of the pain from tariffs has been confined to industries singled out for levies, including autos, steel and aluminum.

    Shaun Cathcart, the real estate board’s senior economist, said, “With sales posting a fourth consecutive increase in July, and almost 4% at that, the long-anticipated post-inflation crisis pickup in housing seems to have finally arrived. The shock and maybe the dread that we felt back in February, March and April seem to have faded,” as people become less concerned about their future employment.

    New Listings

    New supply was little changed (+0.1%) month-over-month in July. Combined with the notable increase in sales, the national sales-to-new listings ratio rose to 52%, up from 50.1% in June and 47.4% in May. The long-term average for the national sales-to-new listings ratio is 54.9%, with readings roughly between 45% and 65% generally consistent with balanced housing market conditions.

    There were 202,500 properties listed for sale on all Canadian MLS® Systems at the end of July 2025, up 10.1% from a year earlier and in line with the long-term average for that time of the year.

    “Activity continues to pick up through the transition from the spring to the summer market, which is the opposite of a normal year, but this has not been a normal year,” said Valérie Paquin, CREA Chair. “Typically, we see a burst of new listings right at the beginning of September to kick off the fall market, but it seems like buyers are increasingly returning to the market.

    There were 4.4 months of inventory on a national basis at the end of July 2025, dropping further below the long-term average of five months of inventory as sales continue to pick up. Based on one standard deviation above and below that long-term average, a seller’s market would be below 3.6 months, and a buyer’s market would be above 6.4 months.

    Home Prices

    The National Composite MLS® Home Price Index (HPI) was unchanged between June and July 2025. Following declines in the first quarter of the year, the national benchmark price has remained mostly stable since May.

    The non-seasonally adjusted National Composite MLS® HPI was down 3.4% compared to July 2024. This was a smaller decrease than the one recorded in June.

    Based on the extent to which prices fell off in the second half of 2024, look for year-over-year declines to continue to shrink in the months ahead.

    Bottom Line

    Homebuyers are responding to improving fundamentals in the Canadian housing market. Supply has risen as new listings surged until May of this year. Additionally, the benchmark price was $688,700, 3.4% lower than a year earlier. That decrease was smaller than in June, and the board expects year-over-year declines to continue shrinking, it said in a statement.

    While many expect the Fed to ease in September, I’m not sure it will happen. The producer price index came in hotter than expected this week. Fed action will depend mainly on the personal consumption expenditures index (PCE), the Fed’s favourite measure of inflation, which will be out on August 29. 

    US stagflation worries have emerged with the release of the July employment report, which showed considerable weakness, enough to get the head of the Bureau of Labour Statistics fired. The likelihood of a BoC cut will increase if the Fed begins a series of easing moves as the administration is demanding.

    Dr. Sherry Cooper

    Oh hi there 👋 It’s nice to meet you.

    Sign up to receive market updates, news, policies, skills, information, knowledge, post updates

    We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

  • Canada’s July Labour Force Survey Was the Weakest Since 2022

    Canada’s July Labour Force Survey Was the Weakest Since 2022

    Canada’s July Labour Force Survey Was the Weakest Since 2022
    Employment fell by 40,800 jobs in July, a weak start to the third quarter, driven by decreases in full-time work, with most of the decline in the private sector. The jobless rate held steady at 6.9%, even though the number of unemployed people fell. The monthly decline was the largest since January 2022, and excluding the pandemic, it’s the most significant drop in seven years. 

    The job loss was concentrated among youth ages 15 to 24 who have had a terrible time finding summer jobs this year. The unemployment rate for that group is a whopping 14.6%, the highest since September 2010 outside of the pandemic. The youth employment rate fell 0.7 percentage points to 53.6% in July—the lowest rate since November 1998, excluding the pandemic. 

    Trump’s tariff turmoil has halted so many crucial financial decisions. Potential homebuyers are deer-in-the-headlights despite the relatively low mortgage rates, strong supply of unsold homes, and lower prices. Potential move-up buyers similarly don’t take action despite the relatively strong bargaining power of buyers. 
    The employment rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 years and older who are employed—fell by 0.2 percentage points to 60.7% in July and was down 0.4 percentage points from the beginning of the year (61.1% in both January and February).

    The number of employees in the private sector fell by 39,000 (-0.3%) in July, partly offsetting a cumulative gain of 107,000 (+0.8%) in May and June. There was little change in the number of public sector employees and in the number of self-employed workers in July.
    The unemployment rate held steady at 6.9% in July, as the number of people searching for work or on temporary layoff varied little from the previous month. The unemployment rate had trended up earlier in 2025, rising from 6.6% in February to a recent high of 7.0% in May, before declining 0.1 percentage points in June.

    Unemployed people continued to face difficulties finding work in July. Of the 1.6 million people who were unemployed in July, 23.8% were in long-term unemployment, meaning they had been continuously searching for work for 27 weeks or more. This was the highest share of long-term unemployment since February 1998 (excluding 2020 and 2021).

    Compared with a year earlier, unemployed job seekers were more likely to remain unemployed from one month to the next. Nearly two-thirds (64.2%) of those who were unemployed in June remained unemployed in July, higher than the corresponding proportion for the same months in 2024 (56.8%, not seasonally adjusted).

    Despite continued uncertainty related to tariffs and trade, the layoff rate was virtually unchanged at 1.1% in June compared with a year ago (1.2%). This measures the proportion of people who were employed in June but were laid off in July. In comparison, the layoff rate for the corresponding months from 2017-19, before the pandemic, averaged 1.2%.

    There were fewer people in the labour force in July as many discouraged workers dropped out, and the participation rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older who were employed or looking for work—fell by 0.2 percentage points to 65.2%. Despite the decrease in the month, the participation rate was little changed on a year-over-year basis.

    Despite continued uncertainty related to tariffs and trade, the layoff rate was virtually unchanged at 1.1% in July compared with 12 months earlier (1.2%). This represents the proportion of people who were employed in June but had become unemployed in July as a result of a layoff. In comparison, the layoff rate for the corresponding months from 2017 to 2019, before the pandemic, averaged 1.2% (not seasonally adjusted).

    There were fewer people in the labour force in July, and the participation rate—the proportion of the population aged 15 and older who were employed or looking for work—fell by 0.2 percentage points to 65.2%. Despite the decrease in the month, the participation rate was stable on a year-over-year basis.

    Employment declined in information, culture and recreation by 29,000 (-3.3%). In construction, employment decreased by 22,000 (-1.3%) in July, following five consecutive months of little change. The number of people working in construction in July was about the same as it was 12 months earlier.

    Employment fell in business, building and other support services (-19,000; -2.8%), marking the third decline in the past four months for the industry. Employment also fell in health care and social assistance (-17,000; -0.6%), offsetting a similar-sized increase in June. Compared with 12 months earlier, employment in health care and social assistance was up by 54,000 (+1.9%) in July.

    Employment rose in transportation and warehousing (+26,000; +2.4%) in July, the first increase since January. On a year-over-year basis, employment in this industry was little changed in July.

    The number of jobs declined in Alberta (-17,000; -0.6%) and British Columbia (-16,000; -0.5%), while it increased in Saskatchewan (+3,500; +0.6%). There was little change in the other provinces.
    Total hours worked in July were little changed both in the month (-0.2%) and compared with 12 months earlier (+0.3%).

    Average hourly wages among employees increased 3.3% (+$1.17 to $36.16) on a year-over-year basis in July, following growth of 3.2% in June (not seasonally adjusted).
    Employment also declined in May in transportation and warehousing (-16,000; -1.4%); accommodation and food services (-16,000; -1.4%), and business, building and other support services (-15,000; -2.1%).
     
    Bottom Line

    The two-year government of Canada bond yield fell about four bps on the news, while the loonie weakened. Traders in overnight swaps fully priced in a quarter-point rate cut by the Bank of Canada by year-end, and boosted the odds of a September cut to about 40%, from 30% previously. 

    Oddly enough, manufacturing payrolls rose in July despite the tariffs. This was the second consecutive monthly gain for a sector that one would expect to be most affected by the trade war. Manufacturing employment has fallen year-over-year.

    This was an unambiguously weak report, but it comes hard on the heels of a robust report. Averaging the two months of data suggests there is an excess supply in the economy. But we will need to see a decline in core inflation for the Bank of Canada to resume cutting interest rates. 

    Traders are now expecting the US central bank to cut interest rates when it meets again in September. With any luck at all, this will pressure the Bank to cut rates as well, but only if the interim two inflation reports show an improvement, and the labour market remains weak. The next jobs report is on September 5, and the Bank of Canada meets again on September 17. 
    Dr. Sherry Cooper
  • Case Study: How Debt Restructuring Can Save You Thousands

    Case Study: How Debt Restructuring Can Save You Thousands

    When you’re juggling multiple loans and high-interest debts, Debt Restructuring can be the financial strategy that brings relief—and significant savings. For many homeowners and buyers in the Vancouver real estate market, understanding how to restructure debt is not just about reducing monthly payments; it’s about creating long-term financial stability.


    Debt Restructuring Explained

    Debt Restructuring is the process of consolidating or reorganizing your existing debts—such as a first mortgage, second mortgage, or credit card balances—into a single, more manageable loan. This often means replacing high-interest debts with one loan at a lower rate, which can save you a substantial amount of money over time.

    For example, instead of paying off several loans at different rates and due dates, you merge them into one loan with a fixed repayment plan. This simplifies budgeting, reduces stress, and helps avoid missed payments.


    Case Study 1: First and Second Mortgage Consolidation

    Imagine you have a first mortgage at 4.9% and a second mortgage at 9.5%. Paying these separately may feel manageable month-to-month, but over the long term, the extra interest on the second mortgage adds up quickly.

    Through Debt Restructuring, you could merge both mortgages into a single loan at, say, 5.5%. While the new rate may be slightly higher than your first mortgage’s rate, it’s much lower than the second mortgage’s rate. The result: you pay less interest overall and simplify your repayment schedule.


    Case Study 2: Adding Credit Card Debt to the Mix

    Now let’s take it a step further. Suppose you have the same first and second mortgages, plus credit card debt at 19.9% interest. By consolidating all three into one restructured mortgage, you replace high-interest revolving debt with a lower fixed rate. This not only reduces your monthly payment but also helps you pay down your debt faster since more of your payment goes toward the principal rather than interest.


    Why Debt Restructuring Matters for Real Estate Buyers and Sellers

    If you’re a home buyer, debt restructuring can improve your credit profile, making it easier to qualify for better mortgage terms. For home sellers, clearing high-interest debt before listing your property may improve your financial flexibility, allowing you to handle closing costs or invest in home staging.

    In a high-cost housing market like Vancouver, these savings can make the difference between feeling financially stretched and maintaining stability. For insights on broader market trends that affect borrowing costs, check out this recent report:
    Today’s Report Shows Inflation Remains a Concern, Forestalling BoC Action.


    A Smart Move: Pair Debt Restructuring with Property Risk Checks

    When you’re making big real estate decisions, understanding your financial position is only half the equation. It’s also important to understand the property you’re buying. Services like EstateDetect.com specialize in investigating potential risks and uncovering opportunities before you commit to a purchase, giving you peace of mind.


    Final Thought:
    Debt Restructuring isn’t just a way to lower payments—it’s a long-term strategy for financial health. By learning how to consolidate loans effectively, you can save thousands in interest and simplify your path toward debt freedom. For more real estate and finance insights, visit MorningLee.ca.

    Case Study: How Debt Restructuring Can Save You Thousands
  • Today’s Lowest Mortgage Rates

    Today’s Lowest Mortgage Rates

    Dropped! Finally dropped! We can see 3.99% now for 3-Year fixed rates.

  • This or That: Selling Your Home Edition?

    This or That: Selling Your Home Edition?

    This month I’ve put together a game of This or That for you. I’m challenging you to not only pick This or That, but also to think about why it’s the better course of action. After you’ve worked through the scenario, read on for the answer and explanation. And let me know how many you got right!
    This or That: Underpricing or Overpricing Your Home?Underpricing is a common strategy in hot markets, since a lower asking price can attract multiple buyers and cause a bidding war. You could end up selling for more than the market value, just because of the demand.Overpricing deters buyers, your home sits on the market for longer, and it transfers the power to the buyer in negotiations.  So, the clear winner is underpricing your home.

    This or That: Selling in the Spring or Selling in the Fall?Selling in the spring means there are a lot more homes on the market at the same time, and typically an active time in the housing market. The US data shows homes sell for 1.6% more than the monthly average in the spring.Selling in the fall means less competition for sellers, and motivated buyers who want to be in a new place before the snow flies. Your real estate agent will also be less busy and can provide you more attention and better service. So, there’s no wrong answer here!

    This or That: Professional Staging, Cleaning and Photography or DIY?Hiring a professional for every job takes time, coordination, and money – and gets great results. To determine if it’s the right move for you, consider how much more you’d be able to sell your home for. If the costs outweigh the benefits, it might be best to skip this step.However, don’t forget that pictures of your home are where potential buyers get their first impression of your home. Without good photos and an accessible environment for viewings, a great buyer might not be interested. This one is a toss up – consulting a neutral third party like your agent or neighbour might help you decide elements are needed and what you can do yourself. One pro tip I can offer you is to use ChatGPT (or Copilot, etc.) to help you with staging and décor – just put in the dimensions and ask for the ideal layout with your existing furniture.

    This or That: Getting an Inspection Before or After Listing?If you get an inspection before you list, you’ll be able to get a full and unbiased review of your home. You can choose to fix any issues, or list as is with a clear picture of your home. You won’t be surprised or blindsided by a buyers’ inspection coming up with issues, you can list the property at the correct price, and you’ll be in the driver’s seat during negotiations.Letting the buyer have an inspection saves money but gives them the power to negotiate. The better course of action here is to inspect pre-listing.

    This or That: Renovate to Increase Your Home’s Value or Leave As-is?Homeowners often complete expensive renovations before selling their home – but frequently don’t make their money back when selling. The new owners may have different tastes, or other plans for the layout or the home (including demolition!). Not only do renovations take time, but they may also require permits, inspections, or approvals. Overall, renovations before you sell are not financially beneficial.However, some repairs are critical to selling your home. Things like a leaking toilet or a hole in the drywall could easily deter a potential buyer and lower the value of your home. The best course of action here is to complete essential repairs so that the home is ready for immediate occupancy – but not spend money on extra renovations.

    This or That: Using a Real Estate Agent or Listing For Sale By Owner (FSBO)?If you go the FSBO route, you take on all the stress and legal responsibility of research, showing, legal documentation and more. The main reason people choose this route is to save on the commission costs of selling a home.The benefits of using an agent are plentiful, like getting the pricing, staging and photography right. You can also rely on them for all the paperwork. If a plot twist comes up, they’re there to help. You can also benefit from having your home listed on their website and their social media accounts to get your property more visibility. The winner for the average person is to use an agent.

    This or That: Requiring Notice in Advance or Showing Anytime?Keeping your home clean, tidy, and free of people and pets so that it’s ready for a showing is a real challenge for sellers if they’re living in the home they’re trying to sell. But for buyers who are already in the neighbourhood, inflexibility to view your home might discourage them from coming back. That means missed opportunities to sell and maybe even a lost sale.There isn’t a clear winner here, but being as flexible as possible with potential buyers creates the most opportunities for a sale.

    This or That: Emotions and Instinct or Advice and Numbers?This might sound like an easy one – but not so fast! The highest bidder might not be the person you want to sell your home to. Imagine you received a thoughtful letter with an offer explaining how the buyer pictures raising their children in your home – vs more money from a developer who plans to raze the property.However, you need a cool head during important negotiations. A few issues are likely to be uncovered during the home inspection. No home is perfect, so don’t let a request for minor repairs derail the deal. The winner here is a balance of emotions and numbers – and each reader will need to find an equilibrium they can live with.

What people say:

“As first-time buyers in Vancouver, we were overwhelmed. Morning Lee didn’t just find us the perfect Kitsilano condo within our budget, she patiently educated us every step of the way. Her negotiation skills were incredible – we got the place below asking in a competitive market! She made a stressful process feel empowering.”


Sarah T.,
Registered Nurse

“Securing the right location for our expanding tech consultancy was critical. Morning Lee understood our business needs intimately, not just the square footage. She found us a strategic Gastown space with growth potential and expertly negotiated the lease terms. Her dual perspective on business and real estate is invaluable.”

Arjun P.,
Founder & CEO, NexGen Solutions

“Financing multiple investment properties can be complex. Morning Lee’s mortgage expertise is next-level. She secured us significantly better rates and terms than we thought possible, structuring the financing perfectly for cash flow. She doesn’t just get mortgages; she builds wealth strategies.”

Elena R.,
Real Estate Investor

“I almost launched my e-commerce platform with costly mistakes. Morning Lee’s ‘Risk Free Startup Success’ framework (PRISMs Method) was my blueprint. Her consulting helped me validate my idea, set up efficient ops, and create a killer digital marketing launch plan. We hit profitability in Month 6 – her guidance was the game-changer.”

David L.,
E-commerce Entrepreneur

“We needed to refinance our manufacturing facility AND improve our bottom line. Morning Lee tackled both seamlessly. She secured optimal commercial financing, freeing up capital, then her profit consulting identified clear operational inefficiencies. Implementing her strategies boosted our profit margin by 30% within a year. A true business partner.”

Marcus W.,
Operations Director, Cascade Manufacturing

“Scaling my team felt chaotic until I worked with Morning Lee. Her consulting, rooted in the principles from ‘From Leadership to Success,’ transformed our culture. She helped define clear roles, implement effective communication channels, and develop a strategic roadmap everyone aligns with. Productivity and morale have soared. Essential leadership wisdom.”

Priya S.,
Marketing Director, Bloom Creative Agency